all AI news
Can LLMs Learn from Previous Mistakes? Investigating LLMs' Errors to Boost for Reasoning
April 1, 2024, 4:47 a.m. | Yongqi Tong, Dawei Li, Sizhe Wang, Yujia Wang, Fei Teng, Jingbo Shang
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org
Abstract: Recent works have shown the benefits to LLMs from fine-tuning golden-standard Chain-of-Thought (CoT) rationales or using them as correct examples in few-shot prompting. While humans can indeed imitate correct examples, learning from our mistakes is another vital aspect of human cognition. Hence, a question naturally arises: \textit{can LLMs learn and benefit from their mistakes, especially for their reasoning? } This study investigates this problem from both the prompting and model-tuning perspectives. We begin by introducing …
abstract arxiv benefits boost cognition cs.cl errors examples few-shot fine-tuning human humans indeed learn llms mistakes prompting reasoning standard them thought type vital
More from arxiv.org / cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (School Specific)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (Python)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (Tier 2)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Data Engineer
@ Lemon.io | Remote: Europe, LATAM, Canada, UK, Asia, Oceania
Artificial Intelligence – Bioinformatic Expert
@ University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston, TX
Lead Developer (AI)
@ Cere Network | San Francisco, US