[D] MetaGPT grossly misreported baseline numbers and got an ICLR Oral!

OpenReview: [https://openreview.net/forum?id=VtmBAGCN7o](https://openreview.net/forum?id=VtmBAGCN7o)

I was looking at ICLR reviews and was surprised to see MetaGPT being submitted to ICLR. The acceptance decision states that they were awarded an Oral (highest level at ICLR).

Looking at the paper, they report these comparisons with HumanEval:

​

|Method|Pass@1|
|:-|:-|
|MetaGPT|85.9|
|GPT-4|67.0|
|GPT-3.5-Turbo (in the response)|48.1|

However the real GPT-4 and GPT-3.5-Turbo numbers on this benchmark are much much higher (see EvalPlus leaderboard: https://evalplus.github.io/leaderboard.html). The results from the EvalPlus leaderboard have been reproduced numerous times, …

decision gpt gpt-3 gpt-3.5 gpt-3.5-turbo gpt-4 humaneval iclr machinelearning metagpt numbers paper report reviews turbo