all AI news
[D] Publishing Negative Results
Feb. 4, 2024, 10:09 a.m. | /u/Raskolnikov98
Machine Learning www.reddit.com
While disheartening, I believe there‘s great value in sharing these results as the hypothesis itself relies on a sensible theoretical foundation, and it‘s not a priori evident that the results would have been negative.
So, my question is, can negative results be published at top ML conferences (NeurIPS/ICLR/ICML/…)? Have any of you faced similar situations? How did you navigate …
foundation hypothesis machinelearning ml research negative project publishing research value
More from www.reddit.com / Machine Learning
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
Senior Machine Learning Engineer
@ GPTZero | Toronto, Canada
ML/AI Engineer / NLP Expert - Custom LLM Development (x/f/m)
@ HelloBetter | Remote
Doctoral Researcher (m/f/div) in Automated Processing of Bioimages
@ Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology (Leibniz-HKI) | Jena
Director, Global Success Business Intelligence
@ Salesforce | Texas - Austin
Deep Learning Compiler Engineer - MLIR
@ NVIDIA | US, CA, Santa Clara
Commerce Data Engineer (Remote)
@ CrowdStrike | USA TX Remote