all AI news
Does Faithfulness Conflict with Plausibility? An Empirical Study in Explainable AI across NLP Tasks
April 2, 2024, 7:43 p.m. | Xiaolei Lu, Jianghong Ma
cs.LG updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org
Abstract: Explainability algorithms aimed at interpreting decision-making AI systems usually consider balancing two critical dimensions: 1) \textit{faithfulness}, where explanations accurately reflect the model's inference process. 2) \textit{plausibility}, where explanations are consistent with domain experts. However, the question arises: do faithfulness and plausibility inherently conflict? In this study, through a comprehensive quantitative comparison between the explanations from the selected explainability methods and expert-level interpretations across three NLP tasks: sentiment analysis, intent detection, and topic labeling, we demonstrate …
abstract ai systems algorithms arxiv conflict consistent cs.ai cs.lg decision dimensions domain domain experts experts explainability explainable ai however inference making nlp process question study systems tasks type
More from arxiv.org / cs.LG updates on arXiv.org
Sliced Wasserstein with Random-Path Projecting Directions
2 days, 7 hours ago |
arxiv.org
Learning Extrinsic Dexterity with Parameterized Manipulation Primitives
2 days, 7 hours ago |
arxiv.org
The Un-Kidnappable Robot: Acoustic Localization of Sneaking People
2 days, 7 hours ago |
arxiv.org
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
Data Engineer
@ Lemon.io | Remote: Europe, LATAM, Canada, UK, Asia, Oceania
Artificial Intelligence – Bioinformatic Expert
@ University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston, TX
Lead Developer (AI)
@ Cere Network | San Francisco, US
Research Engineer
@ Allora Labs | Remote
Ecosystem Manager
@ Allora Labs | Remote
Founding AI Engineer, Agents
@ Occam AI | New York