April 23, 2024, 4:50 a.m. | Cameron R. Jones, Benjamin K. Bergen

cs.CL updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

arXiv:2310.20216v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: We evaluated GPT-4 in a public online Turing test. The best-performing GPT-4 prompt passed in 49.7% of games, outperforming ELIZA (22%) and GPT-3.5 (20%), but falling short of the baseline set by human participants (66%). Participants' decisions were based mainly on linguistic style (35%) and socioemotional traits (27%), supporting the idea that intelligence, narrowly conceived, is not sufficient to pass the Turing test. Participant knowledge about LLMs and number of games played positively correlated with …

abstract arxiv cs.ai cs.cl decisions eliza games gpt gpt-3 gpt-3.5 gpt-4 human prompt public set style test turing turing test type

Data Engineer

@ Lemon.io | Remote: Europe, LATAM, Canada, UK, Asia, Oceania

Artificial Intelligence – Bioinformatic Expert

@ University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston, TX

Lead Developer (AI)

@ Cere Network | San Francisco, US

Research Engineer

@ Allora Labs | Remote

Ecosystem Manager

@ Allora Labs | Remote

Founding AI Engineer, Agents

@ Occam AI | New York