all AI news
Evaluations of Machine Learning Privacy Defenses are Misleading
April 29, 2024, 4:42 a.m. | Michael Aerni, Jie Zhang, Florian Tram\`er
cs.LG updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org
Abstract: Empirical defenses for machine learning privacy forgo the provable guarantees of differential privacy in the hope of achieving higher utility while resisting realistic adversaries. We identify severe pitfalls in existing empirical privacy evaluations (based on membership inference attacks) that result in misleading conclusions. In particular, we show that prior evaluations fail to characterize the privacy leakage of the most vulnerable samples, use weak attacks, and avoid comparisons with practical differential privacy baselines. In 5 case …
abstract arxiv attacks cs.cr cs.lg differential differential privacy identify inference machine machine learning privacy show type utility while
More from arxiv.org / cs.LG updates on arXiv.org
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (School Specific)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (Python)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (Tier 2)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Data Engineer
@ Lemon.io | Remote: Europe, LATAM, Canada, UK, Asia, Oceania
Artificial Intelligence – Bioinformatic Expert
@ University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston, TX
Lead Developer (AI)
@ Cere Network | San Francisco, US