all AI news
Explainable Disparity Compensation for Efficient Fair Ranking
April 23, 2024, 4:44 a.m. | Abraham Gale, Am\'elie Marian
cs.LG updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org
Abstract: Ranking functions that are used in decision systems often produce disparate results for different populations because of bias in the underlying data. Addressing, and compensating for, these disparate outcomes is a critical problem for fair decision-making. Recent compensatory measures have mostly focused on opaque transformations of the ranking functions to satisfy fairness guarantees or on the use of quotas or set-asides to guarantee a minimum number of positive outcomes to members of underrepresented groups. In …
abstract arxiv bias compensation cs.db cs.lg data decision fair functions making ranking results systems type
More from arxiv.org / cs.LG updates on arXiv.org
Sliced Wasserstein with Random-Path Projecting Directions
2 days, 1 hour ago |
arxiv.org
The Un-Kidnappable Robot: Acoustic Localization of Sneaking People
2 days, 1 hour ago |
arxiv.org
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
Data Engineer
@ Lemon.io | Remote: Europe, LATAM, Canada, UK, Asia, Oceania
Artificial Intelligence – Bioinformatic Expert
@ University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston, TX
Lead Developer (AI)
@ Cere Network | San Francisco, US
Research Engineer
@ Allora Labs | Remote
Ecosystem Manager
@ Allora Labs | Remote
Founding AI Engineer, Agents
@ Occam AI | New York