Nov. 8, 2022, 2:16 a.m. | Haotian Chen, Lingwei Zhang, Fanchao Chen, Yang Yu

cs.CL updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

Legal judgment Prediction (LJP), aiming to predict a judgment based on fact
descriptions, serves as legal assistance to mitigate the great work burden of
limited legal practitioners. Most existing methods apply various large-scale
pre-trained language models (PLMs) finetuned in LJP tasks to obtain consistent
improvements. However, we discover the fact that the state-of-the-art (SOTA)
model makes judgment predictions according to wrong (or non-casual)
information, which not only weakens the model's generalization capability but
also results in severe social problems like …

arxiv causality judgment knowledge legal power prediction understanding

Senior Machine Learning Engineer

@ GPTZero | Toronto, Canada

ML/AI Engineer / NLP Expert - Custom LLM Development (x/f/m)

@ HelloBetter | Remote

Doctoral Researcher (m/f/div) in Automated Processing of Bioimages

@ Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology (Leibniz-HKI) | Jena

Seeking Developers and Engineers for AI T-Shirt Generator Project

@ Chevon Hicks | Remote

Principal Data Architect - Azure & Big Data

@ MGM Resorts International | Home Office - US, NV

GN SONG MT Market Research Data Analyst 11

@ Accenture | Bengaluru, BDC7A