Feb. 13, 2024, 5:42 a.m. | Grant C. Forbes Nitish Gupta Leonardo Villalobos-Arias Colin M. Potts Arnav Jhala David L. Roberts

cs.LG updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

Recently there has been a proliferation of intrinsic motivation (IM) reward-shaping methods to learn in complex and sparse-reward environments. These methods can often inadvertently change the set of optimal policies in an environment, leading to suboptimal behavior. Previous work on mitigating the risks of reward shaping, particularly through potential-based reward shaping (PBRS), has not been applicable to many IM methods, as they are often complex, trainable functions themselves, and therefore dependent on a wider set of variables than the traditional …

behavior change cs.lg environment environments intrinsic learn motivation risks set through work

Senior Machine Learning Engineer

@ GPTZero | Toronto, Canada

ML/AI Engineer / NLP Expert - Custom LLM Development (x/f/m)

@ HelloBetter | Remote

Doctoral Researcher (m/f/div) in Automated Processing of Bioimages

@ Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology (Leibniz-HKI) | Jena

Seeking Developers and Engineers for AI T-Shirt Generator Project

@ Chevon Hicks | Remote

Principal Data Architect - Azure & Big Data

@ MGM Resorts International | Home Office - US, NV

GN SONG MT Market Research Data Analyst 11

@ Accenture | Bengaluru, BDC7A