all AI news
A comparative study of conformal prediction methods for valid uncertainty quantification in machine learning
May 6, 2024, 4:43 a.m. | Nicolas Dewolf
cs.LG updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org
Abstract: In the past decades, most work in the area of data analysis and machine learning was focused on optimizing predictive models and getting better results than what was possible with existing models. To what extent the metrics with which such improvements were measured were accurately capturing the intended goal, whether the numerical differences in the resulting values were significant, or whether uncertainty played a role in this study and if it should have been taken …
abstract analysis arxiv comparative study cs.ai cs.lg data data analysis improvements machine machine learning math.st metrics prediction predictive predictive models quantification results stat.ml stat.th study type uncertainty work
More from arxiv.org / cs.LG updates on arXiv.org
Testing the Segment Anything Model on radiology data
1 day, 23 hours ago |
arxiv.org
Calorimeter shower superresolution
1 day, 23 hours ago |
arxiv.org
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (School Specific)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (Python)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (Tier 2)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Data Engineer
@ Lemon.io | Remote: Europe, LATAM, Canada, UK, Asia, Oceania
Artificial Intelligence – Bioinformatic Expert
@ University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston, TX
Lead Developer (AI)
@ Cere Network | San Francisco, US