April 13, 2024, 1:58 a.m. | /u/NarrowHeat557

Machine Learning www.reddit.com

Discussion thread: follow-up of the review release [thread](https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1boea3w/acl_2024_reviews_discussion/).

Reviewer ratings --- Overall Assessment: 3.5, 2, 3; Soundness: 3.5, 3, 3.5; Confidence: 4, 4, 3;

Although we provided a very detailed and in-depth rebuttal of the R2 (who scored 2), they were nonresponsive during the discussion phase. We sent a confidential message to the meta-reviewer identifying that some of the reviewer comments did not comply with the ARR reviewing [checklist](https://aclrollingreview.org/reviewertutorial#6-check-for-lazy-thinking).

*The meta-reviewer's overall assessment was 4*.

>The meta-reviewers agreed with all …

assessment checklist compliance confidence discussions machinelearning meta ratings work

AI Engineer Intern, Agents

@ Occam AI | US

AI Research Scientist

@ Vara | Berlin, Germany and Remote

Data Architect

@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX

Data ETL Engineer

@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX

Lead GNSS Data Scientist

@ Lurra Systems | Melbourne

Lead Data Modeler

@ Sherwin-Williams | Cleveland, OH, United States