Feb. 6, 2024, 5:55 a.m. | Yuhan Zhang Edward Gibson Forrest Davis

cs.CL updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

Language models (LMs) have been argued to overlap substantially with human beings in grammaticality judgment tasks. But when humans systematically make errors in language processing, should we expect LMs to behave like cognitive models of language and mimic human behavior? We answer this question by investigating LMs' more subtle judgments associated with "language illusions" -- sentences that are vague in meaning, implausible, or ungrammatical but receive unexpectedly high acceptability judgments by humans. We looked at three illusions: the comparative illusion …

behavior beings cognitive cs.cl errors expect human humans judgment language language models language processing lms processing question semantics syntax tasks

Founding AI Engineer, Agents

@ Occam AI | New York

AI Engineer Intern, Agents

@ Occam AI | US

AI Research Scientist

@ Vara | Berlin, Germany and Remote

Data Architect

@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX

Data ETL Engineer

@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX

DevOps Engineer (Data Team)

@ Reward Gateway | Sofia/Plovdiv