Feb. 28, 2024, 5:43 a.m. | Maresa Schr\"oder, Dennis Frauen, Stefan Feuerriegel

cs.LG updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

arXiv:2311.18460v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Fairness for machine learning predictions is widely required in practice for legal, ethical, and societal reasons. Existing work typically focuses on settings without unobserved confounding, even though unobserved confounding can lead to severe violations of causal fairness and, thus, unfair predictions. In this work, we analyze the sensitivity of causal fairness to unobserved confounding. Our contributions are three-fold. First, we derive bounds for causal fairness metrics under different sources of unobserved confounding. This enables practitioners …

abstract analyze arxiv confounding cs.ai cs.cy cs.lg ethical fairness framework legal machine machine learning practice predictions sensitivity stat.me type work

Data Engineer

@ Lemon.io | Remote: Europe, LATAM, Canada, UK, Asia, Oceania

Artificial Intelligence – Bioinformatic Expert

@ University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston, TX

Lead Developer (AI)

@ Cere Network | San Francisco, US

Research Engineer

@ Allora Labs | Remote

Ecosystem Manager

@ Allora Labs | Remote

Founding AI Engineer, Agents

@ Occam AI | New York