[D] CVPR wants to penalize reviewers for violating the reviewer guideline!

I cannot believe that CVPR put this motion for voting:

Motion 3: "Any reviewer who has accepted an invitation to review but violates the reviewing guidelines set forth by the conference will be prohibited from submitting any papers to CVPR for up to two years."

Reviewing is a community service, and although I have encountered bad and unfair reviews multiple times, I don't think such a wild action is the way to go to increase the review process quality. Let's …

cvpr machinelearning