Aug. 20, 2023, 10:10 p.m. | /u/Shot-Button-9010

Machine Learning www.reddit.com

ICML 2023 was my first trial. I've got polarized scores, 7/6/4/3, and got rejected. At this moment, I was so disappointed not for the result, but for the quality of review. (The last reviewer didn't read the paper at all.) For the final decision, the last review was so bad as well, not presenting any reason of rejection.

With the same topic, I god 6/5/5/4/4/3 from the NeurIPS 2023. The quality of reviewer is much better than ICML, and I've …

ai conference conference decision icml machinelearning paper quality review

Founding AI Engineer, Agents

@ Occam AI | New York

AI Engineer Intern, Agents

@ Occam AI | US

AI Research Scientist

@ Vara | Berlin, Germany and Remote

Data Architect

@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX

Data ETL Engineer

@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX

Data Scientist (Database Development)

@ Nasdaq | Bengaluru-Affluence