[D] How to deal with false accusations of your paper being AI-generated?

It is a bit depressing to read the quality of subjective reviews I have been getting from my ICLR-2024 paper. Two of them were quite decent, but another two accused me of my paper being a "joke" and AI-generated. It is sad to see one of the allegedly top conferences allowing such delinquent reviews to be publicly posted. Now, a layman will be extremely biased against my research unless the area chairs intervene.

deal false generated iclr machinelearning paper quality reviews them