[D] Reviewers you all need to stop being so lazy dog. Why are reviewers doing things so lazy man?

I submitted a paper.

Gets accepted to conference.

Got email from some random dude from \_insert\_university\_. Sending to both the chair and conference head.

Accuses me a plagarism and says 92% matching of publish papers...

Check cross reference. Title, authors (me and the mentor), data, conclusion, and almost the entire paper is highlighted.

Only source says Arkiv. I have my pre-print on there by chance. I followed their policies with pre-prints and put the notices.

Now, this is very stupid. …

authors check conference dog email head lazy machinelearning paper papers random reference