[D] Why the readability of academic papers are continuously bad?

>>Some of these expectations are inevitable. Papers absolutely have to assume extensive background knowledge and vocabulary specific to the field—including a basic introduction to the field with each paper would be excessive. Sometimes papers assume too much background, but that's hard to judge as a writer or a reader, not least because the set of things people know changes over time and in different contexts.
[Reference](https://www.quora.com/Is-there-an-actual-issue-of-readability-concerning-papers-within-the-academic-world-I-found-that-many-of-the-papers-chose-to-use-extremely-verbose-diction-that-simply-complicated-the-paper-and-made-it-harder-to-read#:~:text=Usually%2C%20what%20you%20refer%20to,is%20trying%20to%20sound%20fancy.)
---
During the past 3 years, to broaden my understanding of ML field, I …

academic basic introduction judge knowledge machinelearning paper papers readability reader writer