all AI news
Detecting critical treatment effect bias in small subgroups
April 30, 2024, 4:43 a.m. | Piersilvio De Bartolomeis, Javier Abad, Konstantin Donhauser, Fanny Yang
cs.LG updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org
Abstract: Randomized trials are considered the gold standard for making informed decisions in medicine, yet they often lack generalizability to the patient populations in clinical practice. Observational studies, on the other hand, cover a broader patient population but are prone to various biases. Thus, before using an observational study for decision-making, it is crucial to benchmark its treatment effect estimates against those derived from a randomized trial. We propose a novel strategy to benchmark observational studies …
abstract arxiv bias biases clinical cs.lg decisions making medicine patient population practice small standard stat.me stat.ml studies subgroups treatment type
More from arxiv.org / cs.LG updates on arXiv.org
Testing the Segment Anything Model on radiology data
1 day, 11 hours ago |
arxiv.org
Calorimeter shower superresolution
1 day, 11 hours ago |
arxiv.org
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (School Specific)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (Python)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (Tier 2)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Data Engineer
@ Lemon.io | Remote: Europe, LATAM, Canada, UK, Asia, Oceania
Artificial Intelligence – Bioinformatic Expert
@ University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston, TX
Lead Developer (AI)
@ Cere Network | San Francisco, US