all AI news
Diffusion versus Auto-regressive models for image generation. Which is better? [D] [R]
April 16, 2024, 1:27 a.m. | /u/InstinctsInFlow
Machine Learning www.reddit.com
I am new to this field of image generation using transformer models. I am curious about the above two mentioned approaches. Particularly in light of this paper "[Visual Autoregressive Modeling: Scalable Image Generation via Next-Scale Prediction](https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02905)" ([results](https://github.com/FoundationVision/VAR?tab=readme-ov-file#-for-the-first-time-gpt-style-autoregressive-models-surpass-diffusion-models)). It looks like these AR (auto-regressive) models seem to be better especially when scaled up compared to DiTs (Diffusion Transformers). Their main inference benefits seem to come from the low sampling efficiency of DiT.
However, I have my doubts regarding this. …
auto diffusion diffusion models distribution hello however image image generation machinelearning major paper results solid theory
More from www.reddit.com / Machine Learning
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
AI Research Scientist
@ Vara | Berlin, Germany and Remote
Data Architect
@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX
Data ETL Engineer
@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX
Lead GNSS Data Scientist
@ Lurra Systems | Melbourne
Senior Machine Learning Engineer (MLOps)
@ Promaton | Remote, Europe
Robotics Technician - 3rd Shift
@ GXO Logistics | Perris, CA, US, 92571