[Discussion] Plagiarised review in top conference

I'm an undergrad and a prof that I am working with asked me to write a review for a paper that was under a double-blind review for a top ML conference -- without any mention of why (I have written paper reviews for them before).

Initially I thought that the review was for a paper of their own, and that they wanted some outside perspective, until, I found my review word-for-word posted over on OpenReview (I found out about this …

conference machinelearning review top