Do More Negative Samples Necessarily Hurt in Contrastive Learning?. (arXiv:2205.01789v1 [cs.LG])

Web: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01789

Recent investigations in noise contrastive estimation suggest, both
empirically as well as theoretically, that while having more "negative samples"
in the contrastive loss improves downstream classification performance
initially, beyond a threshold, it hurts downstream performance due to a
"collision-coverage" trade-off. But is such a phenomenon inherent in
contrastive learning? We show in a simple theoretical setting, where positive
pairs are generated by sampling from the underlying latent class (introduced by
Saunshi et al. (ICML 2019)), that the downstream performance of …

arxiv learning negative