all AI news
Does Faithfulness Conflict with Plausibility? An Empirical Study in Explainable AI across NLP Tasks
April 2, 2024, 7:43 p.m. | Xiaolei Lu, Jianghong Ma
cs.LG updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org
Abstract: Explainability algorithms aimed at interpreting decision-making AI systems usually consider balancing two critical dimensions: 1) \textit{faithfulness}, where explanations accurately reflect the model's inference process. 2) \textit{plausibility}, where explanations are consistent with domain experts. However, the question arises: do faithfulness and plausibility inherently conflict? In this study, through a comprehensive quantitative comparison between the explanations from the selected explainability methods and expert-level interpretations across three NLP tasks: sentiment analysis, intent detection, and topic labeling, we demonstrate …
abstract ai systems algorithms arxiv conflict consistent cs.ai cs.lg decision dimensions domain domain experts experts explainability explainable ai however inference making nlp process question study systems tasks type
More from arxiv.org / cs.LG updates on arXiv.org
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
Data Architect
@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX
Data ETL Engineer
@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX
Lead GNSS Data Scientist
@ Lurra Systems | Melbourne
Senior Machine Learning Engineer (MLOps)
@ Promaton | Remote, Europe
Senior Data Science Analyst- ML/DL/LLM
@ Mayo Clinic | Jacksonville, FL, United States
Machine Learning Research Scientist, Robustness and Uncertainty
@ Nuro, Inc. | Mountain View, California (HQ)