all AI news
Fair Ranking under Disparate Uncertainty
Feb. 22, 2024, 5:43 a.m. | Richa Rastogi, Thorsten Joachims
cs.LG updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org
Abstract: Ranking is a ubiquitous method for focusing the attention of human evaluators on a manageable subset of options. Its use as part of human decision-making processes ranges from surfacing potentially relevant products on an e-commerce site to prioritizing college applications for human review. While ranking can make human evaluation more effective by focusing attention on the most promising options, we argue that it can introduce unfairness if the uncertainty of the underlying relevance model differs …
abstract applications arxiv attention college commerce cs.cy cs.ir cs.lg decision e-commerce evaluation fair human making part processes products ranking review type uncertainty
More from arxiv.org / cs.LG updates on arXiv.org
The Perception-Robustness Tradeoff in Deterministic Image Restoration
2 days, 5 hours ago |
arxiv.org
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
Founding AI Engineer, Agents
@ Occam AI | New York
AI Engineer Intern, Agents
@ Occam AI | US
AI Research Scientist
@ Vara | Berlin, Germany and Remote
Data Architect
@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX
Data ETL Engineer
@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX
Lead GNSS Data Scientist
@ Lurra Systems | Melbourne