Feb. 5, 2024, 3:45 p.m. | Meijia Shao Dong Xia Yuan Zhang Qiong Wu Shuo Chen

stat.ML updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

Two-sample hypothesis testing for network comparison presents many significant challenges, including: leveraging repeated network observations and known node registration, but without requiring them to operate; relaxing strong structural assumptions; achieving finite-sample higher-order accuracy; handling different network sizes and sparsity levels; fast computation and memory parsimony; controlling false discovery rate (FDR) in multiple testing; and theoretical understandings, particularly regarding finite-sample accuracy and minimax optimality. In this paper, we develop a comprehensive toolbox, featuring a novel main method and its variants, all …

accuracy assumptions challenges comparison computation discovery false fdr hashing hypothesis inference math.st memory multiple network node rate registration sample sparsity stat.me stat.ml stat.th testing them

Founding AI Engineer, Agents

@ Occam AI | New York

AI Engineer Intern, Agents

@ Occam AI | US

AI Research Scientist

@ Vara | Berlin, Germany and Remote

Data Architect

@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX

Data ETL Engineer

@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX

Lead GNSS Data Scientist

@ Lurra Systems | Melbourne