Nov. 24, 2022, 7:12 a.m. | Charvi Rastogi, Ivan Stelmakh, Alina Beygelzimer, Yann N. Dauphin, Percy Liang, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Zhenyu Xue, Hal Daumé III, Emma Pierson

cs.LG updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

How do author perceptions match up to the outcomes of the peer-review process
and perceptions of others? In a top-tier computer science conference (NeurIPS
2021) with more than 23,000 submitting authors and 9,000 submitted papers, we
survey the authors on three questions: (i) their predicted probability of
acceptance for each of their papers, (ii) their perceived ranking of their own
papers based on scientific contribution, and (iii) the change in their
perception about their own papers after seeing the reviews. …

arxiv authors decisions peer peer-review review

Lead GNSS Data Scientist

@ Lurra Systems | Melbourne

Senior Machine Learning Engineer (MLOps)

@ Promaton | Remote, Europe

Praktikum im Bereich eMobility / Charging Solutions - Data Analysis

@ Bosch Group | Stuttgart, Germany

Business Data Analyst

@ PartnerRe | Toronto, ON, Canada

Machine Learning/DevOps Engineer II

@ Extend | Remote, United States

Business Intelligence Developer, Marketing team (Bangkok based, relocation provided)

@ Agoda | Bangkok (Central World)