Nov. 8, 2022, 2:16 a.m. | Haotian Chen, Lingwei Zhang, Fanchao Chen, Yang Yu

cs.CL updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

Legal judgment Prediction (LJP), aiming to predict a judgment based on fact
descriptions, serves as legal assistance to mitigate the great work burden of
limited legal practitioners. Most existing methods apply various large-scale
pre-trained language models (PLMs) finetuned in LJP tasks to obtain consistent
improvements. However, we discover the fact that the state-of-the-art (SOTA)
model makes judgment predictions according to wrong (or non-casual)
information, which not only weakens the model's generalization capability but
also results in severe social problems like …

arxiv causality judgment knowledge legal power prediction understanding

Founding AI Engineer, Agents

@ Occam AI | New York

AI Engineer Intern, Agents

@ Occam AI | US

AI Research Scientist

@ Vara | Berlin, Germany and Remote

Data Architect

@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX

Data ETL Engineer

@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX

Business Intelligence Architect - Specialist

@ Eastman | Hyderabad, IN, 500 008