March 5, 2024, 2:52 p.m. | Zhongxiang Sun, Kepu Zhang, Weijie Yu, Haoyu Wang, Jun Xu

cs.CL updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

arXiv:2403.01457v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: In this paper, we address the issue of using logic rules to explain the results from legal case retrieval. The task is critical to legal case retrieval because the users (e.g., lawyers or judges) are highly specialized and require the system to provide logical, faithful, and interpretable explanations before making legal decisions. Recently, research efforts have been made to learn explainable legal case retrieval models. However, these methods usually select rationales (key sentences) from the …

abstract arxiv case cs.cl cs.ir issue judges lawyers legal logic paper results retrieval rules type

Software Engineer for AI Training Data (School Specific)

@ G2i Inc | Remote

Software Engineer for AI Training Data (Python)

@ G2i Inc | Remote

Software Engineer for AI Training Data (Tier 2)

@ G2i Inc | Remote

Data Engineer

@ Lemon.io | Remote: Europe, LATAM, Canada, UK, Asia, Oceania

Artificial Intelligence – Bioinformatic Expert

@ University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston, TX

Lead Developer (AI)

@ Cere Network | San Francisco, US