March 4, 2024, 5:41 a.m. | Alexander Asemota, Giles Hooker

cs.LG updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

arXiv:2403.00105v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Counterfactual explanations are a common approach to providing recourse to data subjects. However, current methodology can produce counterfactuals that cannot be achieved by the subject, making the use of counterfactuals for recourse difficult to justify in practice. Though there is agreement that plausibility is an important quality when using counterfactuals for algorithmic recourse, ground truth plausibility continues to be difficult to quantify. In this paper, we propose using longitudinal data to assess and improve plausibility …

abstract agreement arxiv constraints counterfactual cs.cy cs.lg current data making methodology opportunities practice quality type

Artificial Intelligence – Bioinformatic Expert

@ University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston, TX

Lead Developer (AI)

@ Cere Network | San Francisco, US

Research Engineer

@ Allora Labs | Remote

Ecosystem Manager

@ Allora Labs | Remote

Founding AI Engineer, Agents

@ Occam AI | New York

AI Engineer Intern, Agents

@ Occam AI | US