all AI news
Mining Legal Arguments in Court Decisions. (arXiv:2208.06178v1 [cs.CL])
Aug. 15, 2022, 1:11 a.m. | Ivan Habernal, Daniel Faber, Nicola Recchia, Sebastian Bretthauer, Iryna Gurevych, Indra Spiecker genannt Döhmann, Christoph Burchard
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org
Identifying, classifying, and analyzing arguments in legal discourse has been
a prominent area of research since the inception of the argument mining field.
However, there has been a major discrepancy between the way natural language
processing (NLP) researchers model and annotate arguments in court decisions
and the way legal experts understand and analyze legal argumentation. While
computational approaches typically simplify arguments into generic premises and
claims, arguments in legal research usually exhibit a rich typology that is
important for gaining …
More from arxiv.org / cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
Senior Marketing Data Analyst
@ Amazon.com | Amsterdam, North Holland, NLD
Senior Data Analyst
@ MoneyLion | Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Data Management Specialist - Office of the CDO - Chase- Associate
@ JPMorgan Chase & Co. | LONDON, LONDON, United Kingdom
BI Data Analyst
@ Nedbank | Johannesburg, ZA
Head of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (m/f/d)
@ Project A Ventures | Munich, Germany
Senior Data Scientist - GenAI
@ Roche | Hyderabad RSS