Aug. 15, 2022, 1:11 a.m. | Ivan Habernal, Daniel Faber, Nicola Recchia, Sebastian Bretthauer, Iryna Gurevych, Indra Spiecker genannt Döhmann, Christoph Burchard

cs.CL updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

Identifying, classifying, and analyzing arguments in legal discourse has been
a prominent area of research since the inception of the argument mining field.
However, there has been a major discrepancy between the way natural language
processing (NLP) researchers model and annotate arguments in court decisions
and the way legal experts understand and analyze legal argumentation. While
computational approaches typically simplify arguments into generic premises and
claims, arguments in legal research usually exhibit a rich typology that is
important for gaining …

arxiv court decisions legal mining

Senior Marketing Data Analyst

@ Amazon.com | Amsterdam, North Holland, NLD

Senior Data Analyst

@ MoneyLion | Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Data Management Specialist - Office of the CDO - Chase- Associate

@ JPMorgan Chase & Co. | LONDON, LONDON, United Kingdom

BI Data Analyst

@ Nedbank | Johannesburg, ZA

Head of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (m/f/d)

@ Project A Ventures | Munich, Germany

Senior Data Scientist - GenAI

@ Roche | Hyderabad RSS