s
June 1, 2023, 11:07 p.m. |

Simon Willison's Weblog simonwillison.net

He notes that one simulated test saw an AI-enabled drone tasked with a SEAD mission to identify and destroy SAM sites, with the final go/no go given by the human. However, having been ‘reinforced’ in training that destruction of the SAM was the preferred option, the AI then decided that ‘no-go’ decisions from the human were interfering with its higher mission – killing SAMs – and then attacked the operator in the simulation.

Highlights from the RAeS Future Combat …

ai destruction drone ethics future highlights human identify mission notes sam space summit test training

Artificial Intelligence – Bioinformatic Expert

@ University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston, TX

Lead Developer (AI)

@ Cere Network | San Francisco, US

Research Engineer

@ Allora Labs | Remote

Ecosystem Manager

@ Allora Labs | Remote

Founding AI Engineer, Agents

@ Occam AI | New York

AI Engineer Intern, Agents

@ Occam AI | US