When I wrote about the GitHub Copilot preview in 2021, I noted that the AI pair programmer didn't always generate good, correct, or even running code, but was still somewhat useful. At the time, I concluded that future versions could be real time-savers. Two years later, Copilot is improving. These days, it costs money even for individuals, and it has some competition. In addition, the scope of coding assistants has expanded beyond code generation to code explanations, pull request …
all AI news
Review: CodeWhisperer, Bard, and Copilot X
June 27, 2023, 9 a.m. | Martin_Heller@idg.contractors
InfoWorld Machine Learning www.infoworld.com
ai pair programmer artificial intelligence bard code codewhisperer copilot copilot x costs development tools future genterative ai github good google in 2021 money programmer review running software development versions
More from www.infoworld.com / InfoWorld Machine Learning
3 pernicious myths of responsible AI
1 day, 11 hours ago |
www.infoworld.com
MongoDB aims to jumpstart AI app development with MAAP
2 days, 8 hours ago |
www.infoworld.com
GitHub previews GitHub Copilot Workspace
3 days, 21 hours ago |
www.infoworld.com
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
AI Research Scientist
@ Vara | Berlin, Germany and Remote
Data Architect
@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX
Data ETL Engineer
@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX
Lead GNSS Data Scientist
@ Lurra Systems | Melbourne
Lead Data Scientist, Commercial Analytics
@ Checkout.com | London, United Kingdom
Data Engineer I
@ Love's Travel Stops | Oklahoma City, OK, US, 73120