all AI news
Science Written by Generative AI is Perceived as Less Intelligent, but More Credible and Trustworthy than Science Written by Humans
May 3, 2024, 4:14 a.m. | David M. Markowitz
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org
Abstract: This paper evaluated the effectiveness of using generative AI to simplify science communication and enhance public trust in science. By comparing lay summaries of journal articles from PNAS, yoked to those generated by AI, this work assessed linguistic simplicity across such summaries and public perceptions. Study 1a analyzed simplicity features of PNAS abstracts (scientific summaries) and significance statements (lay summaries), observing that lay summaries were indeed linguistically simpler, but effect size differences were small. Study …
abstract articles arxiv communication credible cs.ai cs.cl cs.cy generated generative humans intelligent journal paper pnas public science science communication trust trustworthy type
More from arxiv.org / cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
ALBA: Adaptive Language-based Assessments for Mental Health
2 days, 13 hours ago |
arxiv.org
PACE: Improving Prompt with Actor-Critic Editing for Large Language Model
2 days, 13 hours ago |
arxiv.org
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (School Specific)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (Python)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (Tier 2)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Data Engineer
@ Lemon.io | Remote: Europe, LATAM, Canada, UK, Asia, Oceania
Artificial Intelligence – Bioinformatic Expert
@ University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston, TX
Lead Developer (AI)
@ Cere Network | San Francisco, US