all AI news
Unveiling the optimization process of Physics Informed Neural Networks: How accurate and competitive can PINNs be?
May 8, 2024, 4:42 a.m. | Jorge F. Urb\'an, Petros Stefanou, Jos\'e A. Pons
cs.LG updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org
Abstract: This study investigates the potential accuracy boundaries of physics-informed neural networks, contrasting their approach with previous similar works and traditional numerical methods. We find that selecting improved optimization algorithms significantly enhances the accuracy of the results. Simple modifications to the loss function may also improve precision, offering an additional avenue for enhancement. Despite optimization algorithms having a greater impact on convergence than adjustments to the loss function, practical considerations often favor tweaking the latter due …
abstract accuracy algorithms arxiv cs.ai cs.lg networks neural networks numerical optimization physics physics.comp-ph physics-informed process results simple study type
More from arxiv.org / cs.LG updates on arXiv.org
Efficient Data-Driven MPC for Demand Response of Commercial Buildings
2 days, 21 hours ago |
arxiv.org
Testing the Segment Anything Model on radiology data
2 days, 21 hours ago |
arxiv.org
Calorimeter shower superresolution
2 days, 21 hours ago |
arxiv.org
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (School Specific)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (Python)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Software Engineer for AI Training Data (Tier 2)
@ G2i Inc | Remote
Data Engineer
@ Lemon.io | Remote: Europe, LATAM, Canada, UK, Asia, Oceania
Artificial Intelligence – Bioinformatic Expert
@ University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston, TX
Lead Developer (AI)
@ Cere Network | San Francisco, US