May 4, 2022, 1:11 a.m. | Terne Sasha Thorn Jakobsen, Anna Rogers

cs.CL updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

Both scientific progress and individual researcher careers depend on the
quality of peer review, which in turn depends on paper-reviewer matching.
Surprisingly, this problem has been mostly approached as an automated
recommendation problem rather than as a matter where different stakeholders
(area chairs, reviewers, authors) have accumulated experience worth taking into
account. We present the results of the first survey of the NLP community,
identifying common issues and perspectives on what factors should be considered
by paper-reviewer matching systems. This …

arxiv community conference paper peer peer-review perspectives review

Lead GNSS Data Scientist

@ Lurra Systems | Melbourne

Senior Machine Learning Engineer (MLOps)

@ Promaton | Remote, Europe

Data Engineer

@ Chubb | Simsbury, CT, United States

Research Analyst , NA Light Vehicle Powertrain Forecasting

@ S&P Global | US - MI - VIRTUAL

Sr. Data Scientist - ML Ops Job

@ Yash Technologies | Indore, IN

Alternance-Data Management

@ Keolis | Courbevoie, FR, 92400