all AI news
Whose LLM is it Anyway? Linguistic Comparison and LLM Attribution for GPT-3.5, GPT-4 and Bard
Feb. 23, 2024, 5:48 a.m. | Ariel Rosenfeld, Teddy Lazebnik
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of generating text that is similar to or surpasses human quality. However, it is unclear whether LLMs tend to exhibit distinctive linguistic styles akin to how human authors do. Through a comprehensive linguistic analysis, we compare the vocabulary, Part-Of-Speech (POS) distribution, dependency distribution, and sentiment of texts generated by three of the most popular LLMS today (GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard) to diverse inputs. The results point to significant linguistic …
abstract analysis arxiv attribution authors bard comparison cs.cl gpt gpt-3 gpt-3.5 gpt-4 human language language models large language large language models llm llms quality text through type
More from arxiv.org / cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
Benchmarking LLMs via Uncertainty Quantification
2 days, 3 hours ago |
arxiv.org
CARE: Extracting Experimental Findings From Clinical Literature
2 days, 3 hours ago |
arxiv.org
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
Data Architect
@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX
Data ETL Engineer
@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX
Lead GNSS Data Scientist
@ Lurra Systems | Melbourne
Senior Machine Learning Engineer (MLOps)
@ Promaton | Remote, Europe
Research Scientist
@ Meta | Menlo Park, CA
Principal Data Scientist
@ Mastercard | O'Fallon, Missouri (Main Campus)