March 26, 2024, 4:45 a.m. | Jakub Paplham, Vojtech Franc

cs.LG updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

arXiv:2307.04570v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Comparing different age estimation methods poses a challenge due to the unreliability of published results stemming from inconsistencies in the benchmarking process. Previous studies have reported continuous performance improvements over the past decade using specialized methods; however, our findings challenge these claims. This paper identifies two trivial, yet persistent issues with the currently used evaluation protocol and describes how to resolve them. We offer an extensive comparative analysis for state-of-the-art facial age estimation methods. Surprisingly, …

abstract age analysis art arxiv benchmark benchmarking call challenge comparative analysis continuous cs.cv cs.lg evaluation improvements performance practices process results state stemming studies type

Data Architect

@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX

Data ETL Engineer

@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX

Lead GNSS Data Scientist

@ Lurra Systems | Melbourne

Senior Machine Learning Engineer (MLOps)

@ Promaton | Remote, Europe

Risk Management - Machine Learning and Model Delivery Services, Product Associate - Senior Associate-

@ JPMorgan Chase & Co. | Wilmington, DE, United States

Senior ML Engineer (Speech/ASR)

@ ObserveAI | Bengaluru