all AI news
Social Choice for AI Alignment: Dealing with Diverse Human Feedback
April 17, 2024, 4:41 a.m. | Vincent Conitzer, Rachel Freedman, Jobst Heitzig, Wesley H. Holliday, Bob M. Jacobs, Nathan Lambert, Milan Moss\'e, Eric Pacuit, Stuart Russell, Haile
cs.LG updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org
Abstract: Foundation models such as GPT-4 are fine-tuned to avoid unsafe or otherwise problematic behavior, so that, for example, they refuse to comply with requests for help with committing crimes or with producing racist text. One approach to fine-tuning, called reinforcement learning from human feedback, learns from humans' expressed preferences over multiple outputs. Another approach is constitutional AI, in which the input from humans is a list of high-level principles. But how do we deal with …
abstract ai alignment alignment arxiv behavior cs.ai cs.cl cs.cy cs.gt cs.lg diverse example feedback fine-tuning foundation gpt gpt-4 human human feedback racist reinforcement reinforcement learning social text type
More from arxiv.org / cs.LG updates on arXiv.org
Jobs in AI, ML, Big Data
Data Architect
@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX
Data ETL Engineer
@ University of Texas at Austin | Austin, TX
Lead GNSS Data Scientist
@ Lurra Systems | Melbourne
Senior Machine Learning Engineer (MLOps)
@ Promaton | Remote, Europe
C003549 Data Analyst (NS) - MON 13 May
@ EMW, Inc. | Braine-l'Alleud, Wallonia, Belgium
Marketing Decision Scientist
@ Meta | Menlo Park, CA | New York City